Blog

Moving to the cloud promises enormous benefits—from increased flexibility and improved scalability to potential cost savings. However, as many companies adopt cloud solutions, a crucial question arises: Do you truly keep a detailed eye on your cloud costs? Do you really understand which factors drive your expenses upward? And how well informed is senior management about these dynamics? Moreover, it’s worth considering whether, in some cases, a self-hosted, in-house infrastructure (an "on-premises solution") might have been just as effective—and even more cost-efficient.

Many IT projects fail due to poor planning, unclear requirements, and rigid processes. The CHAOS Report shows only 31% succeed, often due to unrealistic expectations, lack of technical expertise, and misaligned budgets. This article examines key failure points: premature tech choices, unclear roles, weak stakeholder involvement, and internal politics. Successful projects—like NASA’s Mars Rover and Netflix’s cloud migration—show that iterative, flexible development works. The lesson? Ditch rigid planning, test small features, and involve developers early. To succeed, companies must embrace agility, shorter budget cycles, and continuous learning—not just follow a process. Are we truly adapting, or just going through the motions?

Reactive architecture in Angular leverages NgRx for state management and RxJS for event-driven workflows, ensuring a scalable, maintainable, and high-performance frontend. By following a unidirectional data flow, it eliminates unpredictable state changes and improves efficiency. This architecture consists of three layers: the domain layer for business logic, the feature layer for smart components, and the UI layer for presentation. Optimized state management with selectors, effects, and OnPush change detection reduces unnecessary re-renders and boosts performance. Companies like Netflix and Google use similar principles for real-time applications. Adopting Angular Reactive Architecture helps teams build future-proof applications with clear separation of concerns and efficient state handling.

User stories are the foundation of any Agile development process, yet many product owners (POs) and stakeholders struggle to write them effectively. Whether it’s due to a lack of understanding or rushing the process, poorly written user stories lead to miscommunication, wasted effort, and ultimately, features that fail to deliver value. In this article, we’ll explore how to craft user stories that are clear, actionable, and value-driven. We’ll break down the key elements of a great user story, share actionable tips, and discuss the importance of acceptance criteria and follow-up.

Many organizations claim to be Agile, but are they truly embracing its principles, or are they just following rituals? While Agile was designed to promote flexibility, adaptability, and value-driven development, many teams have fallen into “Agile Theater”—where standups, sprints, and retrospectives happen, but real progress stalls. This article explores how rigid adherence to frameworks like Scrum and SAFe has led teams away from Agile’s core values, turning it into a bureaucratic process rather than a mindset of continuous improvement. Using real-world case studies from companies like USAA, Amazon, and Bosch, we analyze how Agile succeeds when teams focus on small, testable outcomes, continuous feedback, and incremental delivery instead of rigid sprint cycles. The takeaway is clear: Agile frameworks are not the problem—how they are applied is. To rediscover true agility, teams must shift their focus from processes to value, from rituals to results.